Ponderance

(May 2003 - March 2007.) Tama's thoughts on the blogosphere, podcasting, popular culture, digital media and citizen journalism posted from a laptop computer somewhere in Perth's isolated, miniature, urban jungle ...

The Eye Generation

Saturday, October 29, 2005
Eye Generation
In today's (30th Oct 2005) Sunday Times Magazine, there's an article entitled "The Eye Generation" which explores the role of cameraphones in today's increasingly digital culture. I'm quoted a bit talking about cameraphones and the law, drawing on my "Citizen Justice or Opening Pandora's Box?" post and an interview I did with Sheryl-Lee Kerr. While I'm far from eloquent at times, I'm glad this made it in:
Mr Leaver also hesitates at the thought of greater legislation to deal with the potential problems. "It's (the camerphone) definitely more of a good than a bad thing. But the negative consequences could be so dramatic that you want to think them though now," he says. "We at least need to start the conversation (about laws). I am hesitant to say legislate. But we need to start critically thinking about these issues before it's something we're faced with."
I'm not sure if the Sunday Times will put a version of this article online or not, but I'll link to it if they do (not all of their print copy makes it to their website).

Update: In case anyone felt like reading the article, here's a PDF of the "Eye Generation" article.

[Tags: | | | ]

Forbes Magazine Vs The Blogosphere

Friday, October 28, 2005
Daniel Lyons at Forbes Magazine has written Attack of the Blogs (reg. reqd, or BugMeNot), probably the most nasty and cynical analysis of blogging I've ever read. A taster:
Web logs are the prized platform of an online lynch mob spouting liberty but spewing lies, libel and invective. Their potent allies in this pursuit include Google and Yahoo. Gregory Halpern knows how to hype. Shares of his publicly held company, Circle Group Holdings, quadrupled in price early last year amid reports that its new fat substitute, Z-Trim, was being tested by Nestlé. As the stock spurted from $2 to $8.50, Halpern's 35% stake in the company he founded rose to $90 million. He put out 56 press releases last year. Then the bloggers attacked. A supposed crusading journalist launched an online campaign long on invective and wobbly on facts, posting articles on his Web log (blog) calling Halpern "deceitful,""unethical,""incredibly stupid" and "a pathological liar" who had misled investors. The author claimed to be Nick Tracy, a London writer who started his one-man "watchdog" Web site, our-street.com, to expose corporate fraud.He put out press releases saying he had filed complaints against Circle with the Securities & Exchange Commission. Halpern was an easy target. He is a cocky former judo champion who posts photos of himself online with the famous (including Steve Forbes, editor-in-chief of this magazine). His company is a weird amalgam of fat substitute, anthrax detectors and online mattress sales. Soon he was fielding calls from alarmed investors and assuring them he hadn't been questioned by the SEC. Eerily similar allegations began popping up in anonymous posts on Yahoo, but Yahoo refused Halpern's demand to identify the attackers. "The lawyer for Yahoo basically told me, ‘Ha-ha-ha, you're screwed,'" Halpern says. Meanwhile, his tormentor sent letters about Halpern to Nestlé, the American Stock Exchange, the Food & Drug Administration, the Federal Trade Commission and the Brookhaven National Laboratory (involved in Circle's anthrax deal).
That in itself is negative and cynical, but the really nasty stuff comes in the 'sidebar' Fighting Back, which includes:
BASH BACK. If you get attacked, dig up dirt on your assailant and feed it to sympathetic bloggers. Discredit him.

ATTACK THE HOST. Find some copyrighted text that a blogger has lifted from your Web site and threaten to sue his Internet service provider under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. That may prompt the ISP to shut him down. Or threaten to drag the host into a defamation suit against the blogger. The host isn't liable but may skip the hassle and cut off the blogger's access anyway. Also:Subpoena the host company, demanding the blogger's name or Internet address.

SUE THE BLOGGER. If all else fails, you can sue your attacker for defamation, at the risk of getting mocked. You will have to chase him for years to collect damages. Settle for a court order forcing him to take down his material.
The article has got comments from Boing Boing, New Media Musings, BL Ochman, Micro Persuasion and, my favourite balanced reaction, Dan Gillmor:
Another sidebar, called "Fighting Back," actually offers some useful advice including a suggestion that companies start their own blogs. But it also urges aggrieved companies to "(f)ind some copyrighted text that a blogger has lifted from your Web site and threaten to sue his Internet service provider under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act."

Really? Well, I just "lifted" some copyrighted text. This was an exercise called "fair use" -- quoting from other people's copyrighted work to create a new one -- something Forbes does routinely in order to do its ordinarily excellent job of journalism.

Let's hope Forbes returns to its normally higher standards in the future.
I think the article itself is sloppy, but there are downsides to the blogosphere which is as diverse as any other online (or offline) group; the Forbes article is one of the worst possible ways to address these problems.

Update (29 Oct 05, 1.45pm): The EFF respond to the Forbes article by pointing to their excellent Legal Guide for Bloggers, which addresses most of the issues and problems Forbes sensationalises. Tom Raftery joins the conversation, pointing out that "As the article itself points out, Microsoft has 2,000 bloggers - does Forbes really believe that Microsoft is partaking in a lynch mob?", while Doc Searls and Lorrelle on Wordpress continue with many good links. On Google/Blogger's behalf Jason Goldman spins the article around a bit seeing a few positives, but in a rather tongue-in-cheek manner, concluding "And with that I must return to clubbing baby seals so that I might use their skins to publish my slanders.". Scoble, on the other hand, thinks we're being played: "We are being played. What’s a better way to remind the online world you exist? Attack. I bet they have more traffic in this 24-hour period than they’ll have in the past month." (Actually, I'm wondering if Scoble isn't on to something: Forbes is the fifth most searched word on Technorati right now.)

[Tags: | | | | | | | | ]

iT's here!

Tuesday, October 25, 2005
I finished teaching my class last week, am spending the next six weeks writing and am not getting paid a penny. The last thing I wanted to see, was this ...

Burning my credit card aside, the Apple Music Store has hit Australia at $1.69 a track! A one-click solution for my music needs ... I'm (far too) excited! [via decaffeinated]

[Tags: | | | | | | | ]

Stanford on iTunes ... Where Podcasting & Academia Get Together

Saturday, October 22, 2005
Jodi S. Cohen writing in Newsday has an article called "Missed class? Try a podcast" [Via] which begins:
When Purdue University senior Marcos Kohler skipped a physics class to attend a concert in Chicago, he didn't have to borrow a classmate's notes to catch up. Instead, he connected his iPod to a computer, downloaded the lecture, and from the comfort of a campus coffee shop, listened to the two-hour discussion on particle physics. "It re-creates the entire class experience," said Kohler, 22, who missed another lecture at the West Lafayette, Ind., campus when he overslept for the 1:30 p.m. class. A video conference class would be even better, he said, but "to go from paper printouts to audio, this is a step in the right direction." [...] Rick Bischoff, admissions director at Caltech, said a podcast is a perfect way to grab the attention of busy high school seniors. "I want high school students to listen and imagine, `That is a community I want to be part of.' Or say, `That doesn't sound like any place that I want to be a part of.'" Some universities, such as Purdue and North Carolina's Duke University, have university-wide programs that make it easy for professors to podcast.
Podcasting, itself still a newish technology with barely a year behind it, has definitely hit the university scene. Lectures have been available in digital recording form for years, but almost always as streamed audio which required you sitting behind your computer to enjoy your academic audio! As I discussed earlier in 'Podcasting & eLearning', the same systems which created streaming audio can be re-tooled for podcasting (downloadable audio files) without too much hassle (as has happened with the UWA developed iLecture/Lectopia system) and the flexibility of taking your recorded lectures (and other audio and even video) with you in your iPod or other portable media device removes almost any excuse for missing a lecture (at least, that is, in the many hubs of broadband that characterise many Western universities). The potential application for podcasting is extremely broad: in the business of selling learning, podcasts offer a try-before-you-buy sampler; in the business of flexible delivery and eLearning, podcasts offer a reliable, full-quality, portable time-shifted lectures (with audio, now possibly video, albeit without the interactivity of the lecture theatre ... sometimes); and for educators looking for creative tools for getting students at any learning level engaged with their material, getting them to podcast--creating their own innovative digital audio--offers an enticing new assessment/project mediaform.

At Stanford, these technologies have been brought together in a way which will likely set the standard for podcasting within a tertiary framework. Enter iTunes on Stanford (I keep wanting to say iTunes upon Stanford, but maybe that's a bit too Shakespearean!) which is described thus:
Stanford on iTunes provides university-related audio content via the iTunes Music Store, Apple’s popular music jukebox and online music store. Stanford on iTunes gives alumni and the general public free access to a wide range of Stanford-specific digital audio content. The project includes two sites:
[X] a public site, targeted primarily at alumni, which will include Stanford faculty lectures, learning materials, music, sports, and more.
[X] an access-restricted site for students delivering course-based materials and advising content.
In action, it looks like this...
Stanford iTunes
iTunes @ Stanford (2)
iTunes @ Stanford (3)
iTunes @ Stanford (4)
[Click screenshots to enlarge.]
For more information, you can read Stanford's iTunes on Stanford FAQ (PDF), but I definitely think this is the most sophisticated and appealing academic podcasting arrangement I've seen so far (can anyone point out any others that are this far into development?). While there will undoubtably be some backlash about 'students not attending lectures' (etc.) I think flexible learning and eLearning are a part of most university structures, and podcasting offers the best digital lecture combination as far as I'm concerned. Moreover, if we still think of universities as producing, public knowledge, then podcasts offer a wonderful avenue for sharing knowledge outside the ivory tower of academic. Indeed, now I think of it, UWA's Institute for Advanced Studies records and releases streaming versions of many of our public lectures (with speakers as diverse and interesting as Gillian Beer and Mark Poster). There's a streaming archive here, but I must ask them to look into podcasting future lectures. Yes, I think this podcasting thing is here to stay ...

Update (22 Oct 05, 10.15pm): Here is the Official Stanford Press Release. Inside Higher Ed are also talking about Stanford on iTunes and may spawn an interesting discussion on the merits of podcasting.

Update 2 (23 Oct 05, 11.50am): D’Arcy Norman makes two important points:
Very cool. Great to see a Big School “get it” that by sharing resources freely they are not shooting themselves in the foot. Every university should be doing this as part of their contribution back to the community. ps. Yes, I know it’s not really podcasting, but close enough. The spirit is the same, and they provide some handy hooks to download all content at once. So it’s not fed to you via RSS. Whatever…
I completely agree that in the spirit of the university producing public knowledge and the life of the mind, as much as possible should be available publicly. Of course, Stanford on iTunes is, as far as I can tell, just on iTunes (so far, at least), which does exclude normal file downloading without the Apple iTunes interface (which, admitedly, is free, but does chew resources rather greedily on older model PCs). An alternative web-based interface might also be the way to go to make sure everyone can download if they want to.

Update 3 (29 Oct 05, 7.10pm): Wesley Fryer from Moving at the Speed of Creativity has some thoughtful responses, too:
Secondly, it is also not entirely accurate to say that a podcast audience cannot interact with a professor, although the interaction modality certainly can change. There are more tools for out of class interactivity available than ever before. Instant messaging and asynchronous discussion boards, in addition to more traditional email and phone calls, are tools professors are using with success to provide feedback to students. [...] All this discussion again hightlights how podcasting is a disruptive technology. It offers potential to change instruction in fundamental ways. As I have said before, it is the professional obligation of educators to embrace podcasting and use its disruptive potential for constructive opportunities.

[Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | ]

Perth Buzz/FlashMob: Pillow Fight Club!

Friday, October 21, 2005
*Ahem* If you happen to physically be in Perth ...
BuzzMob - Pillow Fight Club!

1st rule of pillow fight club:
Tell everyone you know about pillow fight club
2nd rule of pillow fight club:
Tell everyone you don?t know about pillow fight club
3rd rule of pillow fight club:
If you turn up you must fight!

Flash time - 5.30pm Friday 28 October 2005 (next Friday).

Flash point - Outside the WA Art Gallery. There is an open space near the Perth train station overpass.

What to do -
  Bring a pillow concealed in a bag or backpack
  Turn up at the Flashpoint a few minutes beforehand ie- 5.28pm
  At 5.30pm the mob leaders will pull their pillows out, sound the battle cry and start the fight.
  Join the fray. But please don?t hit to hurt.

Afterwards - A whistle will sound, put your pillow away and disappear as if nothing as happened.

Help spread the word! You can register for receiving updates and for future events at mob@buzzdance.com.au.

Never in the course of human history has one battle meant so little!

Hope to see you there.
BuzzMob

Update (29 Oct 05, 5.45pm): Sadly, I didn't make it to Pillow Fight Club, but Michael Efford did, and he's got a downloadable video to prove it. It looks like a great time was had ...

[Tags: | | | | | | | ]

Artificialities: From Artificial Intelligence to Artificial Culture

Wednesday, October 19, 2005
A few people have asked what exactly my doctoral thesis is all about. Recently I had to write a brief abstract for my supervisor to send to potential markers in order to ask them to be markers, so I thought I'd repost that abstract here to give some sense of what I'm writing.

Artificialities: From Artificial Intelligence to Artificial Culture
Representing and Constructing Identity and Embodiment in Contemporary Speculative Texts


Abstract

This thesis is an examination of the articulation, construction and representation of 'the artificial' in contemporary speculative texts in relation to notions of identity, subjectivity and embodiment. Conventionally defined, the artificial marks objects and spaces which are outside of the natural order and thus also beyond the realm of subjectivity, and yet they are simultaneously produced and constructed by human ideas, labor and often technologies. Artificialities thus act as a boundary point against which subjectivity is often measured, even though that border is clearly drawn and re-drawn by human hands. Paradoxically, the artificial is, at times, also deployed to mark a realm where minds and bodies are separable, ostensibly devaluing the importance of embodiment. Speculative texts, which include science fiction and similar genres across a number of different media, frequently and provocatively deploy ideas of the artificial to interrogate subjectivity, embodiment, spatiality and culture more broadly. In the past two decades the figures of the cyborg and later the posthuman have been the key concepts guiding critical and comparative literary and theoretical studies of speculative texts in terms of the relation between subjects, bodies, technologies and spaces. This thesis builds on these rich foundations in order to situate the artificial in similar terms, but from a nevertheless distinctly different viewpoint. After examining ideas of the artificial as deployed in film, novels and other digital contexts, this thesis concludes that contemporary artificialities act as a matrix which, rather than separating or demarcating minds and bodies or humanity and the digital, reinforce the symbiotic connection between subjects, bodies and technologies.

The thesis structure is five chapters, each focusing on a specific formation of the artificial. The first examines the most recognised trope of artificiality, Artificial Intelligence (AI), as deployed in contemporary science fiction cinema starting with 2001: A Space Odyssey through to the Terminator and Matrix trilogies. The second chapter focuses on the more recent notion of Artificial Life through a close reading of Greg Egan's novels Permutation City and Diaspora. The third chapter then takes a more speculative turn, proposing the category of Artificial Space, building on William Gibson's second trilogy--Virtual Light, Idoru and All Tomorrow's Parties--mapping an updated concept of cyberspace more clearly connected with living bodies. The fourth chapter similarly proposes the notion of Artificial People, drawing on two parallel discourses: the development of subject-centred digital special effects technology, such as that used in the Lord of the Rings film trilogy; and the concept of Stepford in terms of the journey from the 1975 film to the commercially disastrous 2004 re-make. The final chapter, Artificial Culture, is a case study examining artificialities in the post-September 11th Western cultural climate, focusing on the two Spider-Man films. The thesis concludes with an Artificial Coda, reinforcing the symbiotic character of artificialities and suggesting future utility of the concept for critical literary and cultural studies projects. By examining the way artificialities are articulated in speculative texts, the thesis ultimately argues that the artificial destabilises rather than defending conceptual boundaries. The artificial points to the inextricable interlinking of subjects, bodies and technologies while simultaneously questioning each of those categories.

[Tags: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ]

That Great Big Pause Button in the Sky...

Saturday, October 15, 2005
I've got two months until my doctoral thesis is due for submission (the real due date, not the silly one the university first suggets), so I shan't be blogging much until Christmas or thereabouts. I'm also trying to sort of an academic job for next year (anyone want to employ me?). While I should just stay away from the blogosphere, that's unlikely to be possible, but most of the things I find of interest will be turning up in my del.icio.us bookmarks rather than full blog posts. Therefore, I've edited my site feeds so that there are three options:

[ATOM Feed] - Just the posts from Ponderance which will be few and far between.
[del.icio.us Ponderlinks Feed] - My online bookmarks of interesting sites, pages and articles.
[RSS 2.0 Feedburner Feed] - All Ponderance posts and all del.icio.us bookmarks in one handy feed!

I'll still be readily available by email if you need to get in contact.

For a while, then, eXistenZ is paused ...


[Tags: | | | | ]

My WordPress.com Blog!

I'd almost forgotten I'd asked for a hosted WordPress blog, but today I got this email:
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away you entered your email address on http://wordpress.com/ to get a blog.

We're now inviting small groups to use WordPress.com and your email address was selected today!

Visit this address to get started:[Snip]

While you're on a string of good luck it might be a good day to buy a lottery ticket. Better move fast though, because this invite will expire in a week, no exceptions.

Cheers,
The WordPress.com Team
For a while I've been thinking about setting up a separate eLearning blog, so I present: Tama's eLearning Blog (inventive name, I know!). Since I've got a lot happening until the end of the year, it won't really be active until January 2006, but playing with the hosted WordPress release is really fun; it has wonderful functionality!

One Invite to Give Given Away!
WordPress has also given me one invitation to give away for anyone who wants to try out the new WordPress.com. Is that someone you? Email me or leave a comment if you're interested. Update: Invitation gone.

[Tags: | | | ]

Podcasting & eLearning

Podcasting has been around for just over a year, but it has taken off amazingly quickly spurred on not least of all by Apple's decision to make iTunes podcasting-friendly, enabling basically a one-click solution for getting a podcast into the almost ubiquitous iPod. This semester I've had the pleasure of teaching a Communication Studies Honours unit entitled iGeneration: Digital Communication & Participatory Culture at the University of Western Australia. Fortuitously, UWA is also the home of the MultiMedia Centre who created the iLecture (or Lectopia in the US) digital recording, managing and publication system. I wanted to try out podcasting in iGeneration and get students to create their own innovative digital audio for their major projects and I was delighted to discover the the iLecture system was now podcasting-enabled, allowing me to basically drop audio files into the system which would then process and produce both full-file downloads and streaming alternatives. More to the point, the iLecture system can create unit level RSS feeds, basically allowing students to subscribe to the podcast for specific units, like so:
iGeneration iLecture Podcast
[Click to enlarge.]

With many of UWA's lectures recorded digitally, podcasts of lectures will, I suspect, rapidly become a very popular option for catching up on missed lectures. However, for iGeneration the students are producing the podcasts, not me (although I did produce a proof-of-concept podcast just to make sure everything works and to introduce students to podcast a la UWA). Students are currently working on their major projects and their digital audio projects range from an alternative commentary to a Simpsons episode containing a critique of popular culture to a godcast with local content. I'm looking forward to marking them in a couple of weeks and seeing how podcasting works at a tertiary level in terms of assessment. The best thing, of course, is that these final projects are useful far beyond their assessment for the unit. They should remain online indefinitely and should prove useful for online CVs and the like for students. They should also prove a good listen in general terms, so if you're interested, why not subscribe to the iGeneration Podcast RSS feed and at the end of October wait for the audio goodness to arrive!

All being well, I'll be putting up a critque/commentary of using podcasting in academia early next year.

[Tags: | | | | | | | ]

The Steve Jobs Diet (Or: The Video iPod Has Landed)

Thursday, October 13, 2005

The nano made the old mini look obsolete and the just announced Video iPod makes all of its top-range ancestors look rather fat! The Steve Jobs Diet (only Apples!) has decreased the size of even the 60Gb model well below the size of even the last click-wheel model. The big change, though, is the oft-rumoured video capabilities. The new iPod has a larger screen (specs here) and video capability ... or, at least, some video. that's right, after the Steve Jobs diet, you have only see in Apple-developed video formats:
Video formats supported: H.264 video up to 768 Kbps, 320 x 240, 30 frames per sec., Baseline Profile up to Level 1.3 with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 KHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats; MPEG-4 video up to 2.5 Mbps, 480 x 480, 30 frames per sec., Simple Profile with AAC-LC up to 160 Kbps, 48 KHz, stereo audio in .m4v, .mp4 and .mov file formats. (Upgradable firmware enables support for future video formats.)
Supporting generic mp3s was the best idea Apple had when desiging the iPods; not supporting basic mpeg (and even divx) seems to be limiting the iPod Video's appeal and utility. Of course, I suspect it might be the provocation needed for some clever AppleHacker to get some divx enabling firmware out there!

However, the new iTunes does more than just let you download music videos! As Engadget note (straight from Steve Jobs' mouth):
And so today we?re introducing iTunes 6. We?ve been busy!

1. Gifting. This has been the most requested feature. You can gift (i.e. buy) iTunes songs for someone else by song, album, or playlist.
2. Customer reviews.
3. Just for You. Personalized recommendations. We?re going to be recommending albums and singles based on what you?ve bought before. It?s going to be a beta, we?d like your feedback on it.
4. Video. If we?re going to be able to play video on the iPod we?re going to need away to buy video. Starting today we have 2,000 music videos for sale.

What do they cost? $1.99 [US] each. But we didn?t stop there; we?re adding some other videos you can buy. Pixar is putting up six of their award-winning short videos. $1.99 each. We are downloading videos 320 x 240, which is the native resolution of the iPod. They?re about the size of six songs. All songs are governed by FairPlay. You can play them on up to five computers. They?re not rentals. You own them ? they never time out. [...]

We have one more thing today, a pretty big thing. We?re announcing one more thing that you can buy off the iTunes store today, and that is TV shows. What?s the number one show on TV? What?s the second? Lost. And who has these shows? ABC. [...] Lost, Desperate Housewives, Night Stalker, That?s So Raven, The Suite Life. Yes, you can buy current episodes, and you can buy them the day after they are broadcast. They?re ad free so you don?t need to fast forward through the commercials, 320 x 240 again. An hour show is about the size of five albums. Depending on your speed it?s about 10-20 minute to download an episode. What are they going to cost? $1.99 an episode for current season and past seasons. We have free previews on every episode.

Thanks everyone!
This might be that moment ... when TV made the biggest leap since VCRs (or TIVO) to being a real, accessible online resource. TV shows for $1.99 US? I think it's time to get a US credit card! It'll be interesting to see how the national/regional boundaries are enforced now! (Oh, yeah, and you can plug the video iPod into your TV for a better viewing experience ... an excellent move by Apple!).

The Australian pricing: 30Gb A$ 449.00 / 60Gb A$ 598.00 is quite reasonable, so expect a lot of Christmas requests parents of the 'net generation!

Useful/Interesting:
[X] Engadget: Steve Jobs' entire "One More Thing...." presentation.
[X] MAKE Blog: Creating Video for iPod
[X] Tom Raftery's: Apple introduces new iMac (yep, there's a new G5 as well!)
[X] NYTimes, 'Apple Introduces iPod That Plays Videos': "In endorsing handheld video, Mr. Jobs made an 180-degree about-face, reversing his criticism of the low-quality video that is available on portable, low-resolution devices. For the past two years he has been consistently critical of both the technology and the sociology of portable video - the idea that people will use the technology to watch videos in public places where they are engaged in other tasks."
[X] Griffin have a Video iPod & Nano iTrip ready to go!
[X] Flickr: iTunes 6.0 video screenshot.
[X] Techdirt: "Apple Now Selling Expensive, Restricted TV Shows Too".

Update (13 Oct 2005, 11.45): Just reading up on the new iMac G5 ... this thing is amazing. Will I finally buy a Mac? Actually, with the fantastic new Front Row setup, the G5 is more like a brilliant MediaCentre and computer! I think Steve Jobs may have won me over...

Update 2 (13 Oct 2005, 5.15pm): Boing Boing are pointing out that the video iPod (and G5?) have more DRM/more crap-o copy-blocking issues, but they also point to a rather useful HOWTO for ripping DVDs for Mac & iPod Video viewing (if the batteries in the iPod video last long enough for a full film).

[Tags: | | | | | | | | | | ]

That Serenity Post...

Monday, October 10, 2005
I guess I would describe Serenity as a sci-fi action drama about the price of freedom. Or, Citizen Kane with spaceships. I could go either way.
-Joss Whedon

(I said a while ago that I was going to post lots about Serenity when it came out. Then I sat in an internet cafe in Dunedin with my draft post all saved to go ... clicked something ... and the computer power was cut by someone kicking the socket in a fit of gamerish enthusiasm ... the post was lost somewhere in the ether ... this is a shorter version which still says some stuff, but the big, pithy, witty version has gone the way of all organic matter.)

The Film



As an unabashed fan of pretty much everything Joss Whedon has written, it should come as no surprise that Serenity is probably my favourite film so far this year. By now pretty much every film critic and media outlet in the world has posted a review, so let me quote Australia's top film critic David Stratton: "It's like watching Star Wars almost back in 1977." I can't imagine more positive words than that. (Check out the Cinecast podcast for a similarly positive review ... there may be one or two others out there as well!).

The core of Serenity is something many big budget feature films miss: solid characterisation, plotting and dialogue. Joss Whedon is, first and foremost, a story teller. He writes people, and writes them well. Sure, they all seem to be imbued with a tad more wit that your run of the mill individuals, but that makes for good dialogue. Serenity has heart; you care about the characters and they face real challenges with, well, very real (and lasting) consequences. While having seen the short-lived series Firefly may enhance the film, it certainly isn't necessary and Joss does a great job of writing enough exposition to let the film stand alone, while not boring the fans. Each character has a story, and with such an ensemble cast it's impressive that you care about every one ("I am a leaf on the wind..."). On the downside, this is also clearly the first feature film Joss has directed: it is shot more like a TV show, with lots of tighter and functional shots, with the odd wider shot here and there more indicative of budget than planning. That's a small complaint, and didn't really impact my viewing pleasure much (it does, however, seem to be the biggest criticism I've read elsewhere.) In a nutshell, though, this is a clever film, with real characters, real dialogue, dealing with actual issues (more on that below) and doing so in a heartfelt and frequently hilarious way.

The Fans



Serenity is remarkable not just as a film, but for the fact that it got to be a film at all. The film is a prime example of Chris Anderson's idea of the long tail, the idea that commerce online is not restricted to big hits, but recommendations and ever-present back-catalogue can re-invigorate cultural products long after their big media life-span; Serenity was commissioned in large part due to the very, very impressive sales of the Firefly DVDs, despite that series being cancelled after half a season which, combined with Joss Whedon's impressive history and fan-following, led Universal to pick up the franchise as a feature film. Whedon and Universal also cleverly built on that following: rather than an expensive tv and cinema trailer campaign, Universal sunk a lot of their marketing money into grassroots campaigns including the Browncoats recruiting campaign (complete with exclusive Browncoat merchandise for those who earned the most points promoting Serenity in their own right). Perhaps the most impressive promotional aspect from the production side was a series of five short-films distributed as viral media staggered over several weeks which showed River's transformation at the hands of the military (and thus acted as an eerie prequel to both the film and the tv series). Actually the most impressive thing was the clever idea of having (paid) preview screenings months ahead of release for fans. The website You Can't Stop the Signal at times showed details of preview screenings for fans across the US and UK, with similar events for fans in many other countries (including Australia ... and yes, I was lucky enough to see Serenity in early August); shows tended to sell out within hours with no advertising at all (word of mouth is very loud online).

Of note, though, is that for everything Universal did, the fans did far more without prompting. Fan efforts ranged from the usual reviews, blog posts, photoshopped posters, images, trailer cut-ups and the like through to the newer forms. Of particular note is the podcast The Signal which makes the most of the podcasting format to bring together a dozen or so Firefly fans who have produced a digital show about the lead-up to the film's release (and aims to total 16 hour+ length shows plus several specials by the end of October). The team behind The Signal have never all met in person and indeed the first meeting between a few cast members happened at the recent DragonCon. Digital communication technologies have allowed a disparate fan-base to come together online to achieve some amazing things: The Signal podcast is very detailed and has a strong support from the Serenity cast, more than half of whom have been interviewed on the show which also talks about the latest Serenity news, fan happening and even a guide to learning the Chinese language used in the Firefly 'verse. The Signal has been at the top of many of the podcast best-of polls and lists.

A documentary is also being finished not about the making of the film, but rather the input and support of fans in terms of getting the film made; it's called Done The Impossible: A Fan's Tale of Firefly and Serenity. There are lots of other examples out there (such as the Waiting for Serenity short fan-film or the very funny (and adult-oriented) parody Mosquito), so it's worth thinking about how fandom has embraced digital culture to become a considerable part of the promotion a fan-favoured film. Serenity exists because of both fans' enthusiasm and their willingness to consume everything Firefly related.

The Politics



With everyone from the New York Times to About.com comparing Serenity to Star Wars, one has to wonder what they're on about given that Serenity's box office take has been less than stellar so far (although without a doubt it will make its money back and then kick straight into profit with DVD sales ... perhaps enough to justify a sequel or two since Joss has already mentioned they're in his head). The comparrison, to my mind, is more about the politics than the money. The original Star Wars trilogy was about rebellion in the face of imperial rule, but more basically about individual freedom and rights in the face of tyranny and terror. The atmosphere of terror and the unprecedented role of governments in policing and "securing" their citizenry (in the West and elsewhere) has led to a political climate where difference is far from respected. Governments are getting more and more power, and citizens are rapidly losing their rights (often with consent). The difference between being evil and being a little bit naughty is pretty much disappearing, with absolutes being powerfully re-deployed. Thus, in a film that has its heroes boldly state, "I aim to misbehave", the comparison with contemporary politics is easy to make. Indeed, the heroes of Serenity ultimately use the media to combat a seemingly monolithic and impenetrable government. The crew of Serenity are the bloggers, podcasters, citizen journalists and pirates of their day and speak loudly to those today who aren't evil, just different to the conservative far right norm hailed and embraced by US and Australian governments. As the tagline states, The Future is Worth Fighting For, and Serenity offers a powerful metaphor for those struggling to maintain their rights and dignity in the face of a conservative right-wing political climate. That, I suggest, is Serenity's similarity to Star Wars, and a similarity well worth thinking about.

The Links (or some of them..)

The Ballad of Joss [Direct MP3] [Lyrics] [Via]
[Official Serenity Movie Website] [Official Australian Serenity Website] [Browncoats] [Whedonesque] [WhedonWiki] [The Signal, Serenity-dedicated Podcast] [Can't Stop The Signal] [Session 416]

Feel free to post other interesting links in the comments below ...

And if you're unsure whether Serenity is the film for you, go and watch the first nine minutes of Serenity for free at iFilm. I suspect the film's opening will win most of you over!

[Tags: | | | | | | | | | ]

Congratulations Simone & Paul!

Sunday, October 09, 2005
A lot of fantastic stuff happened while I was away in New Zealand. I caught up with the entire Stuart side of the family, many of whom I've not seen for more than a decade; we celebrated my grandad's 80th birthday; and all of my immediate family and I saw my grandparents who I've not met up with for a while, which was wonderful. However, the biggest news by far has to be my little sister got engaged! Paul, ever the closet romantic, proposed during their trip through New Zealand and the news was announced as they reached Dunedin! Congratulations to you both!!!!!

Simone & Paul SimonePaul
Check this out! Simone, Paul and a Sofa

The Great Big Catch-up Post

Wednesday, October 05, 2005
I'm back from New Zealand where I had a fantastic time (I'll be posting pictures and a story or two in the next day or two). Two weeks, however, is a long time in net-time. There's a lot that has slipped by, but a few things which have caught my eye reviewing two weeks worth of emails, blogs and other messages include ...

[X] The NYTimes looks at Yahoo's entry into the print-book scanning realm, parallelling Google's efforts. [Via]

[X] Australian IT, Tom Raftery & Scoble plus lots of others are talking about the Sun/Google pairing: online office is just around the corner!

[X] The BBC has a dire warning in "Australian poor students warning": "Following plans to increase university fees, the Australian education department is reporting a reduction in numbers of disadvantaged students."

[X] Steven "Everything Bad is Good For You"Johnson talks Web 2.0 in Discover Magazine. Also check out the Web 2.0 Conference Coverage.

[X] Waxy & Co's Upcoming.org just got Yahoo!ed!

[X] The Duke University Podcasting Symposium has its full archive online; Apophenia presented "mainstream-ification and podcasting" there; JD Lasica talks about the RIAA rep who was there.

[X] The new Rooster Teeth machinima series PANICS (?People Acting Normal in Crazy-Ass Situations?) is much funnier than The Strangerhood, getting back to the basics of military folk being silly! [Via]

[X] Margaret Pomeranz and David Stratton, Australia's top movie critics review Serenity with David stating: "It's like watching Star Wars almost back in 1977." I can't imagine higher praise for a film! (TIME also has an interview with Joss Whedon and Neil Gaiman.)

[X] The Shining trailer, remixed and Westside Story as a horror film are two of the cleverest edits I've seen! (Details.) (Update: Also check out Scary Titanic, a Psycho RomCom and EDOTSM as Horror.) [Via]

[X] The planet Xena has a moon: Gabrielle! :) [Via]

[X] Crooks & Liars feature Kanye West and Mike Myers: Part II. A good move by Myers!

[X] Cory Doctorow is podcasting.

[Tags: | | | | | | | | ]